Can Radioactive Iodine Cause Cancer?

Radioactive Iodine (RAI) therapy, also known as iodine-131 or I-131 treatment, is a common and highly effective medical intervention used primarily to treat hyperthyroidism and differentiated thyroid cancer. The procedure involves administering a radioactive isotope of iodine, which is swallowed by the patient, often in a capsule or liquid form. The therapy is designed to destroy overactive thyroid tissue or eliminate residual cancer cells left behind after surgery. For many patients, a major concern is the potential for developing a secondary cancer years later due to the radiation exposure. Evaluating the safety profile of RAI therapy requires examining its targeted mechanism and long-term findings from large-scale medical studies.

How Radioactive Iodine Targets the Thyroid

The fundamental principle of RAI therapy relies on the unique biology of the thyroid gland, which is the only organ in the body that naturally absorbs and stores iodine. Thyroid cells require iodine to produce essential thyroid hormones, drawing it efficiently from the bloodstream. This biological mechanism allows the radioactive isotope, I-131, which is chemically identical to stable iodine, to be selectively concentrated within thyroid tissue and any thyroid cancer cells.

Once the I-131 is taken up by the thyroid cells, it emits high-energy beta particles, which are electrons that travel a very short distance, typically only a few millimeters. This limited range ensures that the radiation dose is delivered directly to the targeted thyroid tissue, causing localized damage and cell death. The highly localized effect minimizes the radiation exposure to most other organs and tissues in the body. Any excess I-131 that is not absorbed by the thyroid is eliminated naturally from the body, primarily through urine, within a few days.

Statistical Evidence for Secondary Cancer Risk

The question of secondary cancer risk following RAI therapy is a major focus of long-term epidemiological research, which compares outcomes in treated patients to those who did not receive the treatment. Large-scale studies involving thousands of patients over decades have provided clarity on the overall safety profile. These investigations show that while a small relative increase in the risk of secondary malignancies is observed, the absolute risk remains low, particularly when weighed against the benefits of treating the primary thyroid condition.

The risk of secondary cancer appears to be dependent on the radiation dose. Higher cumulative doses of I-131, typically used for aggressive thyroid cancer, show a stronger association with increased risk, sometimes seen with cumulative RAI doses over 150 millicuries (mCi). The time between treatment and the potential development of a secondary cancer, known as the latent period, varies by cancer type.

Leukemia risk is often elevated in the short term, typically within two to three years of exposure. In contrast, the elevated risk for solid tumors tends to manifest much later, often 20 years or more after the initial RAI treatment. Although the absolute excess risk is generally quite small, one analysis estimated the absolute excess risk of a secondary malignancy to be only around 0.5% over a ten-year period.

Specific Cancers Associated with Treatment

While the overall absolute risk is low, specific organs have shown a tendency for elevated risk, often linked to how the non-absorbed I-131 passes through or is temporarily concentrated in these tissues. Leukemia, a cancer of the blood cells, is one of the most consistently reported secondary malignancies. Specifically, acute myeloid leukemia is the type most discussed, with studies indicating that RAI therapy can nearly double the risk in young patients.

Solid cancers have also been identified, particularly in organs that are exposed to radiation as the I-131 circulates and is excreted from the body. The salivary glands, which naturally process iodine, show a significantly higher risk of cancer following RAI therapy, with some studies reporting a relative risk increase of over 200%. Cancers of the gastrointestinal tract, such as the stomach, colon, and bladder, are also implicated because these organs are exposed to the radioactive iodine during elimination.

For women, there is a noted association with an increased risk of breast cancer and uterine cancer, especially in those treated at a younger age. These specific cancer risks highlight the need for careful risk assessment, particularly for younger patients who have a longer life expectancy after treatment.

Minimizing Risk and Long-Term Patient Monitoring

Clinical practice focuses heavily on minimizing the risk of secondary cancers by adhering to specific protocols, primarily involving individualized dose calculation. For patients with hyperthyroidism, the goal is often to use a small dose of I-131 intended to destroy the overactive tissue, which typically carries a lower secondary cancer risk. Treatment for thyroid cancer requires higher doses, and clinicians must carefully balance the dose needed to eliminate the cancer against the potential long-term risk.

To reduce exposure to non-thyroid tissues, patients are encouraged to take specific actions, such as drinking plenty of fluids and frequently voiding to hasten the elimination of unabsorbed I-131 from the bladder. For several days post-treatment, patients are advised to follow radiation safety precautions, including maintaining distance from others and avoiding close contact with pregnant women and children. These precautions help manage the radiation still present in the patient’s body and reduce exposure to others.

Long-term monitoring is an integral part of post-treatment care, designed to detect potential secondary malignancies at an early and treatable stage. This surveillance typically includes regular physical examinations and blood work to monitor for signs of bone marrow suppression or changes in blood cell counts that could indicate leukemia. Given the identified risk to the salivary glands, physicians monitor for related symptoms, and regular breast cancer screening may be emphasized for younger women.