The Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) is a standard outpatient treatment for precancerous cervical cells. The procedure uses a thin, electrified wire loop to precisely remove a shallow, cone-shaped piece of tissue from the cervix. This tissue contains abnormal or precancerous cells, often identified as dysplasia or Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia (CIN), following an abnormal Pap test and colposcopy. Since a portion of the cervix is surgically removed, patients often worry about whether this tissue loss is permanent and how the body handles the structural change.
The Nature of Cervical Tissue Regeneration
The cervix does not “grow back” like a regenerating limb, but the remaining tissue is highly capable of healing and repair. The body’s natural regenerative process quickly repairs the excision site by restoring the epithelial lining, the surface layer of the cervix. This surface healing usually takes about four to six weeks, covering the wound bed with new, normal cells.
Beyond the surface, the deeper connective tissue (stroma) also undergoes a slower, significant regeneration process. Studies measuring cervical length and volume show substantial structural recovery over time. The most marked regeneration occurs during the first three to six months after the LEEP procedure.
Research indicates the cervix often recovers a high percentage of its original structure, commonly reaching between 83% and over 90% regeneration after six months. However, this repair process rarely leads to a complete return to the original size, resulting in a “cervical regeneration deficit.” The final length of the cervix is structurally sound, but it is often shorter than it was before the excision.
Monitoring and Screening After LEEP
Follow-up care must be rigorous to ensure abnormal cells do not return, as the risk of residual or recurrent disease exists. Standard monitoring involves co-testing: a combination of the Pap test (cytology) and the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) test.
The typical follow-up schedule involves testing every six to twelve months for at least the first two years post-procedure. If results remain negative, the patient transitions to a less frequent, ongoing screening regimen. The HPV test is particularly useful, as the persistence of high-risk HPV after LEEP is the strongest predictor of recurrence.
If the margins of the removed tissue contained abnormal cells (positive margins), immediate and close monitoring is necessary. The LEEP targets the transformation zone where cell changes begin. After the procedure, this zone may recede higher into the endocervical canal, potentially making future sampling more challenging. Therefore, follow-up testing carefully evaluates both the external cervical surface and the canal.
LEEP’s Impact on Future Pregnancy and Fertility
For women of childbearing age, the impact of LEEP on future reproductive health is a primary concern. The procedure does not generally affect a woman’s ability to conceive or her fertility. The small risk of scar tissue forming over the cervical opening (cervical stenosis) is rare and treatable.
The main reproductive concern is carrying a pregnancy to term. Tissue removal results in a shorter cervix, which slightly increases the risk of the cervix opening prematurely during pregnancy, known as cervical incompetence. This mechanical change contributes to an elevated risk of preterm birth, defined as delivery before 37 weeks of gestation.
The degree of risk correlates with the depth of the excised tissue. Excisions deeper than 15 millimeters are associated with a greater chance of preterm delivery. Women who have undergone LEEP are often treated as high-risk during subsequent pregnancies and require close monitoring.
Specialized monitoring involves regular transvaginal ultrasounds to measure cervical length throughout the second trimester. If the length is critically short, prophylactic measures may be recommended, such as a cervical cerclage—a stitch placed in the cervix for support. Research suggests that the underlying HPV infection and the original precancerous condition may also independently contribute to the risk of preterm birth.

