Immunotherapy for Melanoma: How It Works and What to Expect

Melanoma is a type of skin cancer that develops in melanocytes, the cells responsible for producing the pigment melanin. This malignancy is particularly aggressive when it spreads beyond the skin, historically presenting a difficult treatment challenge. Immunotherapy has fundamentally changed the landscape of care by harnessing the body’s own defense mechanisms to locate and attack cancer cells. This approach shifts focus from traditional methods, like chemotherapy, which broadly target rapidly dividing cells, to enhancing the immune system’s inherent ability to fight disease.

How Immunotherapy Works Against Cancer

The immune system constantly surveys the body, using specialized T-cells, to identify and eliminate abnormal cells, including cancer. Cancer cells are adept at evading this surveillance, often by mimicking healthy cells or creating a suppressive microenvironment. They display signals that essentially tell T-cells, “Do not attack,” putting a brake on the immune response.

This evasion is facilitated by communication between proteins on the surface of cancer cells and those on T-cells, a process known as an immune checkpoint. The fundamental strategy of immunotherapy is to interrupt this communication pathway, thereby lifting the cancer’s camouflage. Removing these inhibitory signals allows T-cells to become fully activated and recognize malignant cells as a threat.

Unlike cytotoxic chemotherapy, which directly kills cancer cells and damages healthy ones, immunotherapy’s mechanism is indirect. It restores the natural anti-tumor activity of the patient’s T-cells. This manipulation generates a systemic effect that targets cancer cells throughout the body and establishes long-term immune memory against future recurrence.

Approved Immunotherapy Approaches for Melanoma

The most widely utilized form of melanoma immunotherapy is the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors, which block the “off” switches cancer uses to hide from T-cells. One major class targets the Programmed Death-1 (PD-1) pathway, using drugs such as pembrolizumab and nivolumab. These therapies block the interaction between the PD-1 receptor on T-cells and its ligand, PD-L1, often overexpressed on melanoma cells, allowing T-cells to remain active.

Another significant class targets the Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) pathway, exemplified by ipilimumab. CTLA-4 acts earlier in the immune response to suppress T-cell activation; blocking it releases the initial brake on T-cell priming. Combining a CTLA-4 inhibitor with a PD-1 inhibitor, such as nivolumab and ipilimumab, has demonstrated improved response rates in metastatic melanoma, though this combination often increases the risk of side effects.

Beyond checkpoint inhibition, oncolytic virotherapy offers a distinct mechanism, particularly for tumors accessible for direct injection. This approach uses a genetically modified virus, such as talimogene laherparepvec (T-VEC), engineered to selectively infect and replicate within cancer cells, causing them to burst. This cell lysis releases tumor-specific antigens, creating a local vaccine that stimulates a systemic anti-tumor immune response.

Adoptive Cell Therapy, specifically involving Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs), represents a personalized strategy. It involves harvesting the patient’s own T-cells from the tumor, which are already recognizing the cancer. These cells are then greatly expanded in a laboratory setting to billions. The T-cells are subsequently re-infused back into the patient, where they seek out and destroy cancer cells throughout the body.

Navigating the Treatment Process and Side Effects

Immunotherapy is typically administered intravenously (IV) in an outpatient setting, with schedules varying based on the drug and combination used, often ranging from every two to six weeks. Patients must be closely monitored due to the unique nature of possible adverse events. Since these treatments unleash the immune system, the side effects differ fundamentally from those of chemotherapy.

The resulting toxicities are known as immune-related adverse events (irAEs), occurring when newly activated T-cells mistakenly attack healthy organs and tissues. These events can affect virtually any organ system. The most common irAEs involve the skin (rash), gastrointestinal tract (colitis/diarrhea), and endocrine glands (hypophysitis or thyroiditis). Onset can vary widely, sometimes appearing weeks or months after treatment begins, or even after it has stopped.

Managing irAEs requires a high index of suspicion and rapid intervention, differing from the management of cytotoxic side effects. Patients are educated to report any new or unusual symptoms immediately, as severity can escalate quickly. Mild irAEs may be managed with close observation. However, moderate to severe events often require temporary cessation of immunotherapy and administration of immunosuppressive medications, most commonly high-dose corticosteroids, to calm the overactive immune response.

Endocrinopathies, such as thyroiditis or adrenal insufficiency, are often permanent and require long-term hormone replacement therapy, as the immune attack can destroy hormone-producing cells. Timely management of these immune-driven side effects is necessary to ensure patient safety and allow for the continuation of treatment.

Measuring Success and Emerging Strategies

Immunotherapy has altered the prognosis for patients with advanced melanoma, leading to previously unattainable response rates and long-term survival. A notable feature is the potential for a durable response, where the tumor remains controlled for many years after therapy completion. Clinical trials show that combination checkpoint blockade helps over half of patients with metastatic melanoma achieve a five-year overall survival, a figure historically in the single digits.

Treatment success is not limited to metastatic disease. Immunotherapy is also used in the adjuvant setting for patients whose melanoma has been surgically removed but who remain at high risk of recurrence. Giving these treatments after surgery aims to eliminate any microscopic cancer cells left behind, significantly reducing the chance of the cancer returning. This preventative use has become a standard of care for many patients with high-risk stage III and stage IV melanoma.

Research focuses on overcoming primary and acquired resistance, as not all patients respond to initial immunotherapy. One promising strategy involves exploring new combination approaches, such as pairing checkpoint inhibitors with personalized cancer vaccines designed to prime the immune system with specific tumor antigens. Other emerging therapies are targeting new inhibitory immune checkpoints, such as LAG-3, to enhance the T-cell response against the malignancy.