What Did Tomatoes Used to Look Like?

The modern tomato is a global staple that has been profoundly transformed from its wild ancestor through human selection over thousands of years. The fruit seen today in grocery stores—large, uniformly red, and generally firm—bears little resemblance to the tiny berries from which it originated. Understanding the tomato’s evolution requires tracing its journey from a small, weedy plant in South America to the cultivated varieties that dominate agriculture today.

The Wild Ancestor

The original ancestor of the cultivated tomato is the currant tomato, Solanum pimpinellifolium, native to the Andes region of South America, specifically Ecuador and Peru. This wild progenitor resembled a small berry rather than a large fruit. The size of these wild tomatoes was often less than one centimeter (10–15 millimeters) in diameter, making them comparable to a small blueberry or a currant, which is how the species earned its common name.

These tiny fruits grew on slender, sprawling plants with a weedy or vining habit, unlike the structured, upright growth of modern cultivars. While some wild varieties display a red color when ripe, the ancestral fruits were also commonly found in shades of green or yellow. The wild tomato’s appearance was optimized for survival and seed dispersal, resulting in a small, self-pollinating fruit with high genetic diversity.

Early Domestication and Color Shift

The first major shift in the tomato’s appearance was driven by indigenous peoples, likely in Mesoamerica, where the fruit was fully domesticated around 7,000 years ago. Early farmers began selecting for plants that produced larger fruits, a process that initiated a genetic bottleneck in the tomato’s lineage. This selection for size marked the transition from the wild currant tomato to intermediate forms like the cherry tomato, S. lycopersicum var. cerasiforme.

This early phase saw a significant physical increase in fruit size, driven partly by mutations in genes like fruit weight 2.2 (fw2.2), a repressor of cell division. Selecting for a non-functional version of this gene allowed more cells to form in the fruit, increasing its final size by up to 30%. Along with the size increase, the tomato’s color palette expanded, with cultivators preserving varieties of various colors, including yellows, purples, and different shades of red, before the modern focus on a single color took hold.

Modern Appearance: The Role of Selective Breeding

The final stage of the tomato’s visual transformation occurred in the 20th century, driven by the commercial need for fruits that could withstand long-distance shipping and provide a standardized consumer product. Breeders selected intensely for specific traits that prioritized firmness, uniformity, and shelf stability over traditional flavor or appearance characteristics. The pursuit of an even red color led to the widespread adoption of the “uniform ripening” gene.

In naturally ripening tomatoes, the area around the stem retains a dark green shoulder due to high levels of chloroplasts that contribute to the fruit’s sugar content. The uniform ripening mutation eliminates this dark green shoulder, causing the fruit to transition from an even light green to a uniform red shade, making it visually appealing for commercial markets. This gene provides a standardized look but reduces the chloroplast activity in the fruit, resulting in a less intense flavor and lower sugar content compared to heirloom varieties that still display the green shoulder. This industrial focus on firmness and uniform appearance created the modern, standardized tomato.