The scientific understanding of gender and identity integrates findings from genetics, endocrinology, neurology, and psychology. Science clearly distinguishes between biological sex (physical characteristics) and gender, which refers to an individual’s internal sense of self. Gender identity is a multifaceted psychological and neurological phenomenon.
Defining Biological Sex
Biological sex is defined by a combination of chromosomes, gonads, and anatomy. Sex determination begins at conception with the inheritance of sex chromosomes, typically resulting in an XX pattern (female development) or an XY pattern (male development).
The short arm of the Y chromosome initiates the male developmental pathway. This segment contains the SRY gene (Sex-determining Region Y), which acts as the master switch for gonadal development. The protein produced by the SRY gene acts as a transcription factor, activating a cascade of other genes. This signal causes the embryonic gonads to differentiate into testes, rather than ovaries.
Once formed, the testes produce hormones, primarily testosterone, which drive the development of male reproductive anatomy. In the absence of the SRY gene, the bipotential gonads develop into ovaries. This process represents the standard binary path for sex determination. However, it is only the starting point for a much more complex developmental picture.
The Role of the Brain and Hormones in Identity
The brain’s development is shaped by sex hormones in a process separate from genital formation. Scientists differentiate between two types of hormonal effects: organizational and activational. Organizational effects occur during critical periods, particularly prenatally, causing permanent structural changes in the developing brain. Activational effects are temporary and reversible, such as the hormonal surge during puberty that triggers secondary sex characteristics.
Prenatal exposure to sex steroids, like testosterone, has a permanent organizational effect on the nervous system, influencing sexually dimorphic brain regions. This hormonal environment, rather than sex chromosomes alone, is a major factor in developing a person’s core gender identity. The resulting neuroanatomy provides the biological substrate for psychosexual development.
Neuroscience research has identified specific brain structures that differ in size or cell number between cisgender men and women. For instance, the central subdivision of the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis (BSTc) is typically larger and contains more neurons in men. Studies show that the size and neuron count of the BSTc in transgender individuals often align with their affirmed gender, rather than the sex assigned at birth. Similarly, the interstitial nucleus of the anterior hypothalamus 3 (INAH3) shows structural differences in transgender people that correlate with their lived gender identity. These findings suggest that the internal sense of gender has a measurable basis in brain structure, which may be organized prenatally by atypical hormonal exposure for that individual’s chromosomal sex.
Understanding Scientific Models of Gender Identity
Gender identity is defined as an individual’s deep-seated, internal sense of being a man, woman, both, neither, or somewhere else along the gender spectrum. This internal feeling is distinct from gender expression, which is the external manifestation of gender through clothing, behavior, and mannerisms. Scientific consensus views gender identity as a fundamental aspect of self, typically established early in childhood.
Developmental models propose that a rudimentary gender identity is acquired by children around age two or three, when they can consistently label themselves and others by gender. This early development results from the interaction between an individual’s biological predisposition (established prenatally) and early social experiences. Theories like Gender Schema Theory suggest that once children establish a gender identity, they actively seek information about what that gender means, which then structures their understanding of the world.
This process is not a simple choice but an innate construct deeply rooted in the self. For most people, the gender assigned at birth aligns with this internal sense, resulting in a cisgender identity. For transgender individuals, the biological processes determining external sex and the neurological processes organizing the brain’s sense of gender appear to have developed in discordant directions.
Current models reject the simplistic notion of “nurture versus nature.” They favor a model where biological factors set the stage, and psychological development solidifies the internal sense of gender. Research indicates that gender identity is durable, meaning it is not easily changed by external forces.
Scientific Perspectives on Gender Variation
Science recognizes that human sex and gender exist along a continuum, moving beyond a simple male/female binary. This variation is demonstrated by Differences in Sex Development (DSDs), formerly known as intersex conditions. DSDs are conditions where the development of chromosomal, gonadal, or anatomical sex is atypical. These conditions show that the components of biological sex—chromosomes, gonads, and hormones—do not always align neatly.
Specific examples illustrate this complexity. Complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome (CAIS) involves an individual with XY chromosomes whose body cannot respond to testosterone, resulting in female external anatomy. Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia (CAH) involves a person with XX chromosomes exposed to high levels of androgens prenatally, leading to the masculinization of external genitalia. These natural variations confirm that sex differentiation is complex and susceptible to genetic or hormonal influences.
Beyond biological sex variation, scientific models recognize that gender identity itself is not strictly binary. The concept of gender as a spectrum accounts for non-binary identities, where an individual’s internal sense of self is not exclusively man or woman. Variations in gender identity, including transgender and non-binary identities, are understood by science as part of the natural diversity of human development, rather than a disorder. The scientific literature has increasingly shifted to recognize this.

