What Happens When a Colonoscopy Cannot Be Completed?

A colonoscopy is a standard medical procedure used to examine the entire large intestine for polyps and early signs of colorectal cancer. It involves inserting a long, flexible tube with a camera, called a colonoscope, through the rectum and advancing it through the colon. For the procedure to be considered complete, the endoscopist must successfully navigate the scope all the way to the cecum, the junction with the small intestine. When the physician cannot reach this final destination, the procedure is designated as an incomplete colonoscopy, meaning a portion of the colon remains unexamined.

Defining Procedural Incompletion and Common Causes

An incomplete colonoscopy occurs when the professional cannot advance the colonoscope to the cecum, leaving the proximal or right side of the colon unvisualized. This failure happens in approximately 4% to 25% of cases, depending on the patient population. An incomplete procedure does not mean the entire colonoscopy was unsuccessful, as the visualized segments were still examined for lesions.

The most frequent technical cause for incompletion is inadequate bowel preparation, where residual stool obscures the lining and prevents safe advancement. Anatomical factors often present physical barriers, such as a redundant or tortuous colon, which is a longer and more winding large intestine that causes the scope to loop and become difficult to maneuver. Adhesions from prior abdominal or pelvic surgery can also fix parts of the colon, creating sharp angles or strictures that impede the scope’s progress.

Patient discomfort, even under sedation, may necessitate stopping the procedure early to protect the patient from injury. Other factors associated with an incomplete procedure include advanced age, female sex, and a lower body mass index. The immediate priority is ensuring the unexamined segment of the colon is investigated through an alternative diagnostic method.

Alternative Diagnostic Methods

Once a traditional colonoscopy is terminated prematurely, the next step is selecting an alternative method to visualize the remaining portion of the colon. The choice depends highly on the reason for the original procedure’s failure. If the cause was poor bowel preparation, the patient is often instructed to repeat the colonoscopy with a more aggressive or modified prep regimen, typically within 12 months.

The most common alternative diagnostic test is Computed Tomography Colonography (CTC), often referred to as a Virtual Colonoscopy. This non-invasive imaging technique uses a CT scanner to create detailed, three-dimensional images of the entire colon after full bowel preparation and gentle gas inflation. A primary advantage of CTC is its ability to map the entire colon and detect clinically significant polyps, specifically those 6 millimeters or larger, with high accuracy.

CTC is purely a diagnostic tool and lacks the therapeutic capability of a traditional colonoscopy, meaning it cannot remove any polyps it identifies. It also exposes the patient to a low dose of radiation and is less sensitive at detecting very small or flat lesions. If a suspicious finding is detected on the virtual colonoscopy, a follow-up therapeutic colonoscopy is required to remove the lesion and obtain a tissue sample.

Another option for visualizing the unexamined segment is Flexible Sigmoidoscopy, but this is only useful if the original failure occurred early in the procedure, as it only examines the lower third of the colon. Colon Capsule Endoscopy involves the patient swallowing a small, pill-sized camera that transmits images as it travels through the digestive tract. While it avoids sedation and is non-invasive, it requires a full bowel prep and has a lower completion rate than CTC.

Establishing the New Screening Schedule

The long-term screening plan for a patient with an incomplete colonoscopy is determined by the results of the subsequent alternative diagnostic test. If the follow-up test, such as CT Colonography, is clear and shows no signs of polyps or masses, the patient can often return to the standard screening interval. For average-risk individuals who had a normal alternative test, the recommended interval for the next screening is typically five years if CTC was used, or a return to the ten-year interval for a full colonoscopy.

If the alternative test detects polyps or suspicious lesions, the screening timeline shifts toward a diagnostic and therapeutic pathway. Any polyp found by CTC or capsule endoscopy must be removed, requiring a targeted or repeat colonoscopy to perform the necessary polypectomy and biopsy. Once lesions are removed, the patient is placed on a surveillance schedule based on the size and type of the removed polyp, often involving a repeat colonoscopy sooner than the standard ten-year interval. An incomplete procedure does not negate the need for continued screening, and the healthcare team will establish a safe and effective plan to ensure the entire colon is regularly monitored.