What Is the Difference Between a PICC Line and a Port?

A PICC line and a port do the same basic job. Both give medicines a reliable route into a large vein near the heart, so you are not stuck with a new needle for every treatment. The real difference is how much of the device lives inside you: a PICC stays partly outside the skin of the arm, while a port sits entirely under the skin. That means the choice mostly comes down to how long treatment will last, with PICCs fitting weeks and ports fitting months or years.¹

What Each Device Looks Like and Where It Goes

A PICC line is a long, very thin, flexible tube, usually placed in one of the large veins of the upper arm.² The tube is threaded inside the vein until its tip rests in a large vein just above the heart.³ A short length of tube and an injection cap stay outside the skin, and that is where nurses connect medicines.⁴ The tube is held in place with a securement device and a clear dressing, so nurses can always see the entry point. Because the cap is already outside the body, medicines are connected without a needle, which is the main convenience of a PICC.

A PICC can have one, two or three separate channels, often listed as single, double or triple lumen, so different drugs can run at the same time.⁵ A multi-channel PICC can carry an infusion and allow a blood draw at once, which helps in complicated treatment.⁶

A port has two parts: a soft tube placed in a large chest vein, ending in about the same spot as a PICC tip, and a small chamber attached to it.⁷ The whole device sits under the skin, leaving only a small bump that clothing usually hides.⁸ Most ports go in the chest, but some are placed in the arm.⁹ You can feel a coin-sized raised disc, often below the collarbone, but there is no dressing and no dangling tube.

Because nothing sticks out, a port is reached by pushing a special needle through the skin into the chamber whenever it is used. A nurse finds the disc with their fingers, cleans the skin, and pushes the special needle straight down into the chamber’s soft center. The top of the chamber is made of a self-sealing material, so it closes up again when the needle comes out, and the port can be used many times. Numbing cream or a cooling spray on the skin beforehand keeps the stick brief for most people, and it only happens on treatment days.

Which One Fits How Long Your Treatment Lasts

PICCs are generally used for IV medicines given over weeks, while ports are used for treatment lasting months or often years.¹⁰ Lifestyle and personal preference still count alongside treatment length.¹¹

In practice, a few weeks of IV antibiotics for a deep infection such as one in a bone is the situation PICCs were built for. Chemotherapy given in cycles over several months, with rest periods between, often suits a port, because the device can sit unused and unseen between treatments. People who need repeated IV courses over years, as with cystic fibrosis, may be offered a port so they avoid placing a new PICC every time. If your treatment length is uncertain, ask your team which device they expect you to need.

These boundaries are not rigid. For children with blood cancers, some care teams have used PICCs through the whole of chemotherapy, though those lines needed replacing a little more often.¹² Hospitals also differ in which device they offer, partly depending on their resources and staff.¹³ It helps to ask how many months your treatment is expected to last, whether your hospital routinely places both devices, and how many channels your drugs will require at once.

How Each Affects Showering, Dressing and Daily Life

In one comparison of breast and colon cancer patients, 88% with a PICC had trouble showering, bathing or washing, versus 18% with a port.¹⁴ About two-thirds of PICC users changed how they dressed by three months, compared with one-third of port users.¹⁵ And 42% of PICC users had people comment on the device, against 13% with a port.¹⁶ Nearly half of PICC users worried their device would get infected, versus about 1 in 12 with a port.¹⁷

The bathing problem comes down to water. Water must not reach a PICC dressing, so in the shower the arm is usually covered with a waterproof sleeve or wrap made for the purpose. Baths and swimming are generally avoided, because soaking the arm raises the chance of germs reaching the entry point. If the dressing gets wet or loose, a nurse should change it promptly rather than leaving it in place.

A port that is not in use has nothing on the skin to protect, so washing is normal. Once it has healed, most people with a port can swim, though it is worth asking your team first. While a needle is in the port for a treatment, its dressing has to stay dry, just as with a PICC.

Clothing and exercise matter too. Heavy lifting and repetitive arm workouts are usually limited on the PICC arm, and short sleeves leave the tube visible, which many people prefer to avoid. A chest port can rub under a bra strap or seatbelt, so a little padding helps. Ask your team which activities are safe for your device.

Despite all this, several trials found no overall difference in quality of life between the two devices.¹⁸ Within those trials, though, ports made a clear difference for taking a bath and working out.¹⁹

Infections, Clots and Other Risks

Among cancer patients, infections occurred in about 12% with a PICC versus 6% with a port.²⁰ Mechanical problems such as blockage or the tube slipping out happened in 7% of PICCs versus 4% of ports.²¹ In adults fed by IV at home, bloodstream infections were about 2 per 1,000 days of use with PICCs and none with ports.²² In children with cancer, ports had the lowest infection rates both in hospital and at home.²³

Clots in the arm vein favor ports too. In one randomised trial of cancer patients, 8% of PICC users developed a deep vein clot versus 1% with a port.²⁴ Pooling 22 studies, ports carried well under half the clot risk of PICCs in cancer patients.²⁵ One large comparison found clot rates similar, about 3% for each.²⁶

Knowing the warning signs lets you act early. A fever or shaking chills can mean germs have entered the bloodstream through the device, especially if they appear during or soon after a flush or infusion. This is urgent, so call your team or seek care right away rather than waiting to see if it passes.

Redness, warmth, swelling, pus or pain where a PICC enters the skin, or over a port, can mean a local infection. Local signs sometimes appear before a fever does. A PICC that slides out, or shows more tube outside than before, should be reported too.

Swelling of the arm that holds the line, or of the neck or face, can signal a clot in the vein. Pain, a heavy feeling or skin discoloration in that arm can go along with it, and any of these should be reported promptly. Sudden shortness of breath or chest pain needs emergency care, since a clot can travel to the lungs.

Home Care Each Device Needs

Flushing means pushing saline or a blood thinner through the tube to stop clots forming.²⁷ A PICC is usually flushed daily, while an unused port needs it about once a month.²⁸ Some people are taught to flush a PICC themselves, which involves several steps and strict hand cleaning each day. Others have a home nurse do it, so ask early which arrangement your team expects.

A PICC dressing is usually changed every 7 days, or every 2 days if gauze sits underneath.²⁹ At that visit, a nurse removes the old dressing and cleans the skin around the entry point with an antiseptic. They check how much tube is outside the skin to make sure the line has not moved since last time. A new clear dressing goes on, and the injection cap may be replaced at the same visit.

A port asks far less. When it is in active use, the needle in it and its dressing are changed every 7 days.³⁰ Between cycles there is no dressing and nothing to keep dry. The monthly flush is often timed with a clinic visit, and missing scheduled flushes raises the chance of a blockage.

Getting It Put In and Taken Out

A PICC can be inserted at the bedside, with the vein found using ultrasound.³¹ The arm is numbed, and the procedure usually takes under an hour. Most people go home or back to their room afterward.

A port needs a minor surgical procedure to place it.³² You get local numbing plus light sedation, and the surgeon makes a small cut in the chest to create a pocket for the chamber. The site is usually sore for several days and needs a short healing period, so ask beforehand whether you need someone to drive you home.

Removing a PICC is simple: the tube is pulled out at the bedside without surgery or sedation.³³ Removing a port takes another minor outpatient procedure much like the first.³⁴ After cancer treatment ends, some people keep their port in case they need treatment again, while others have it taken out.³⁵ Keeping it saves another procedure if treatment resumes, but it means continuing the monthly flushes. Your oncologist can tell you how likely you are to need more treatment.

How the Costs Compare

A port costs more to place, while a PICC costs less to put in but more to maintain because of regular dressings.³⁶ Over a long course, the gap narrows.³⁷

In one analysis, a PICC was cheaper over 6 months but more expensive than a port over 12 months.³⁸ Reviews of economic studies generally favor ports for cost-effectiveness in chemotherapy.³⁹ One trial, however, found no significant cost difference between the two.⁴⁰

For your own situation, ask your insurer how they cover placement versus home nursing and supplies, since coverage can differ between the devices. Weekly PICC dressing visits also cost travel and time, which are easy to overlook.

What Happens If the Line Gets Blocked

A thin layer of clotting material forms around the tip of most central lines within two weeks of insertion.⁴¹ This layer usually causes no problems and does not predict a clot in the vein.⁴² It can, however, sometimes partly block the line.⁴³

A common pattern is fluids going in easily while blood cannot be drawn back out. Resistance when flushing is an early sign and should be reported rather than pushed through, because forcing a flush can damage the line.

Nurses can leave a clot-dissolving drug inside the tube to restore flow.⁴⁴ In one group of blocked ports, a single dose fixed the problem in 78% of cases, and a second dose raised that to 87%.⁴⁵ This works best early, as older, tougher buildup may not dissolve.⁴⁶

1
Texas IR. Port Catheter vs PICC Line: Which is Right for Chemo? | Katy ↩︎
2
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. What Is the Difference Between a PICC Line and a Port ↩︎
3
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. What Is the Difference Between a PICC Line and a Port ↩︎
4
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. What Is the Difference Between a PICC Line and a Port ↩︎
5
OncoLink. PICC Line ↩︎
6
Deltamed. Single or multi-lumen PICCs: what ↩︎
7
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. What Is the Difference Between a PICC Line and a Port ↩︎
8
PubMed Central. Central venous catheters: Which, when and how ↩︎
9
PubMed Central. Central venous catheters: Which, when and how ↩︎
10
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation. What Is the Difference Between a PICC Line and a Port? ↩︎
11
Texas IR. Port Catheter vs PICC Line: Which is Right for Chemo? | Katy ↩︎
12
PubMed Central. Peripherally inserted central catheters can be an alternative to tunneled central venous catheters in chemotherapy for hematological and oncological pediatric patients ↩︎
13
European Journal of Cancer Care. Central Venous Access Device Selection and Insertion in Children With Blood Disorders and Cancer: An International Cross‐Sectional Survey ↩︎
14
PubMed Central. Comparison of the Quality of Life of Patients with Breast or Colon Cancer with an Arm Vein Port (TIVAD) Versus a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) ↩︎
15
PubMed Central. Comparison of the Quality of Life of Patients with Breast or Colon Cancer with an Arm Vein Port (TIVAD) Versus a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) ↩︎
16
PubMed Central. Comparison of the Quality of Life of Patients with Breast or Colon Cancer with an Arm Vein Port (TIVAD) Versus a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) ↩︎
17
PubMed Central. Comparison of the Quality of Life of Patients with Breast or Colon Cancer with an Arm Vein Port (TIVAD) Versus a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) ↩︎
18
DigitalCommons@PCOM. Is the use of a PORT as opposed to a PICC more effective in improving quality of life in patients receiving chemotherapy? ↩︎
19
DigitalCommons@PCOM. Is the use of a PORT as opposed to a PICC more effective in improving quality of life in patients receiving chemotherapy? ↩︎
20
PubMed. Complication rates of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted ports in patients receiving systemic anticancer therapy: A retrospective cohort study ↩︎
21
PubMed. Complication rates of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted ports in patients receiving systemic anticancer therapy: A retrospective cohort study ↩︎
22
PubMed Central. Central line–associated bloodstream infections and complications in adult home parenteral nutrition: Observations from a quality improvement initiative ↩︎
23
PubMed. Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infections in Pediatric Hematology/Oncology Patients With Different Types of Central Lines ↩︎
24
PubMed. Clinical impact of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted port catheters in patients with cancer: an open-label, randomised, two-centre trial ↩︎
25
PubMed. Risk of VTE associated with PORTs and PICCs in cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis ↩︎
26
PubMed. Complication rates of peripherally inserted central catheters vs implanted ports in patients receiving systemic anticancer therapy: A retrospective cohort study ↩︎
27
Beacon Concierge Nursing. PICC Line Care at Home, Greater Boston | Beacon Nursing ↩︎
28
Beacon Concierge Nursing. PICC Line Care at Home, Greater Boston | Beacon Nursing ↩︎
29
Houston Methodist. Central Venous Catheter Insertion and Maintenance ↩︎
30
Houston Methodist. Central Venous Catheter Insertion and Maintenance ↩︎
31
Texas IR. Port Catheter vs PICC Line: Which is Right for Chemo? | Katy ↩︎
32
Carolina Nephrology, PA. Port and PICC Line Procedures ↩︎
33
Texas IR. Port Catheter vs PICC Line: Which is Right for Chemo? | Katy ↩︎
34
Texas IR. Port Catheter vs PICC Line: Which is Right for Chemo? | Katy ↩︎
35
Texas IR. Port Catheter vs PICC Line: Which is Right for Chemo? | Katy ↩︎
36
CION Cancer Clinics. Chemo Port and PICC Line Cost ↩︎
37
CION Cancer Clinics. Chemo Port and PICC Line Cost ↩︎
38
PubMed Central. Cost-utility analysis of centrally inserted totally implanted access port (PORT) vs. peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) in the oncology chemotherapy ↩︎
39
PubMed. Totally implanted ports and peripherally inserted central catheters for chemotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical outcomes and economic evaluations ↩︎
40
PubMed. Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignancies ↩︎
41
Haematologica. Thrombolytic therapy for central venous catheter occlusion ↩︎
42
Haematologica. Thrombolytic therapy for central venous catheter occlusion ↩︎
43
Haematologica. Thrombolytic therapy for central venous catheter occlusion ↩︎
44
PubMed Central. Case review and imaging: Treatment of central venous catheter associated fibrin sheath and chronic thrombus with the ClotTriever system ↩︎
45
Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management. Fibrin sheaths in central venous port catheters: treatment with low-dose, single injection of urokinase on an outpatient basis ↩︎
46
PubMed Central. Case review and imaging: Treatment of central venous catheter associated fibrin sheath and chronic thrombus with the ClotTriever system ↩︎