Marimastat was an investigational drug developed in the 1990s to treat various forms of cancer. It belonged to the family of matrix metalloproteinase inhibitors (MMPIs), designed to interfere with processes central to tumor progression. The drug was orally bioavailable, positioning it as a promising candidate for widespread cancer treatment. Despite initial enthusiasm and late-stage clinical trials, Marimastat ultimately failed to receive regulatory approval.
How Marimastat Works to Fight Disease
The theoretical foundation for Marimastat’s anti-cancer activity centered on its ability to inhibit Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs), a family of more than 20 enzymes. MMPs are naturally occurring enzymes responsible for breaking down the extracellular matrix (ECM), the structural scaffolding surrounding cells and tissues. While this remodeling process is regulated in a healthy person, MMPs are often overexpressed by cancer cells.
Cancer cells use these enzymes to degrade the ECM, allowing malignant cells to escape the primary tumor site and move into the bloodstream, a process known as metastasis. MMPs also facilitate angiogenesis, the formation of new blood vessels that tumors need to grow. Marimastat functioned as a broad-spectrum inhibitor, targeting several different MMP types (including MMP-1, MMP-2, MMP-7, and MMP-9). The drug’s structure includes a hydroxamate group that binds tightly to the zinc atom at the MMP enzyme’s active site, blocking its degradative function. By blocking these enzymes, Marimastat was designed to prevent the physical spread of cancer cells and limit the tumor’s blood supply.
Which Cancers Were Targeted
Marimastat was investigated across a wide range of advanced solid tumors, reflecting the universal role of MMPs in cancer biology. Early Phase I and Phase II trials included patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and gastric cancer. These studies often focused on patients with late-stage, metastatic disease.
The goal of these trials was not to achieve traditional tumor shrinkage, but rather to slow the progression of the disease. Researchers focused on patients with rising serum tumor markers, such as prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or CA-125, monitoring the rate of rise to measure the drug’s biological effect. This positioned Marimastat primarily as a disease management tool for advanced disease.
Why the Drug Was Not Approved
The primary obstacle to Marimastat’s approval was its failure to meet required endpoints in large-scale Phase III clinical trials. Despite promising preclinical data and initial biological activity suggested by tumor marker stabilization, the drug did not translate into a statistically significant improvement in overall patient survival. For instance, a Phase III trial involving over 500 patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer showed no meaningful difference in survival compared to a placebo.
The lack of demonstrable efficacy prompted researchers to re-evaluate the entire MMPI strategy. One explanation for the failure was the drug’s broad-spectrum nature, which inhibited many MMPs indiscriminately. It was later understood that while some MMPs facilitate cancer growth, others may have anti-tumor properties, meaning the drug inadvertently blocked beneficial biological processes. Furthermore, Marimastat was often tested in patients with very advanced cancer, a stage where the tumor may have moved past its MMP-dependent invasion phase.
The Unique Toxicity Profile
A significant factor contributing to the drug’s ultimate failure and poor patient compliance was a unique and debilitating side effect known as musculoskeletal syndrome. This toxicity was a dose-limiting event that appeared in a large percentage of patients, particularly those receiving higher doses. The syndrome manifested as inflammatory polyarthritis, characterized by severe joint pain (arthralgia), tendonitis, and joint stiffness.
Symptoms often began within weeks of starting treatment, frequently requiring patients to interrupt or discontinue their dosing regimen. In severe cases, patients developed skin thickening and contractures, particularly in the hands, which reduced their quality of life. This toxicity was linked to Marimastat’s broad inhibition of MMPs and related enzymes involved in normal connective tissue turnover. The need for frequent dose interruptions made long-term, consistent treatment challenging, compromising the drug’s potential efficacy.

